Two Ethereum proposals fight over how to shield old contracts from Glamsterdam
Two rival fixes would keep Ethereum's planned gas changes from breaking existing smart contracts. They disagree on how to do it.
Advertising disclosure: we may earn a commission when you join an operator via links on this page, at no cost to you. This never dictates our ratings. How we make money
Key takeaways
- Two competing proposals target the same problem: Glamsterdam's planned gas changes could break existing contracts.
- The approaches differ on what contracts see and what users pay.
- The source gives no implementation details, so neither fix looks settled.
- Contract developers may need to watch which approach wins.
Ethereum developers have two rival proposals on the table. Both aim to stop the gas changes planned for the Glamsterdam upgrade from breaking contracts that are already deployed, CoinDesk reported on Monday.
Same goal. Different methods.
Two approaches, one problem
Per the report, the proposals take different routes to the same finish line. One works on what contracts actually see when they run. The other works on what users end up paying. Either way, the idea is to keep old code running once the gas rules shift.
That's all we can confirm. The source material doesn't lay out the technical mechanics, who's backing which proposal, or when a decision might land. We won't guess.
Why it matters
Gas costs are baked into how plenty of contracts behave. Reprice things so code can't afford what it used to do, and a contract that's worked for years can start failing. Funds or functions can get stuck. Immutable contracts can't just be patched. That's the point of them.
If you hold tokens, use DeFi or run a protocol, the practical question is simple. Does Glamsterdam ship with a compatibility safeguard, and what does that safeguard cost? One approach could change fees for users. The other could change how contracts perceive the network. Neither's free. Watch which one developers pick.
Source: CoinDesk
Top Crypto Casinos Right Now
🇺🇸 Showing sites that accept players from United States Change country
Advertising disclosure: we may earn a commission when you join an operator via links on this page, at no cost to you. This never dictates our ratings. How we make money
More info Less info
Why we chose it: A US-facing book that pays a premium for crypto deposits: 125% against 100% for cash, with fee-free deposits across five coins.
- Payout time
- Within 24 hours (crypto)
- KYC
- Required
Restricted countries: Australia, Afghanistan, Bulgaria, Central African Republic, Congo - Brazzaville, Eritrea, France, Guinea-Bissau and 16 more.
More info Less info
Why we chose it: BetNow's casino floor with the biggest match bonus we list. The 200% headline deserves a careful read of the code terms behind it.
- Payout time
- Within 24 hours (crypto)
- KYC
- Required
Restricted countries: Australia, Afghanistan, Bulgaria, Central African Republic, Congo - Brazzaville, Eritrea, France, Guinea-Bissau and 16 more.
More info Less info
Why we chose it: A US-oriented casino that turns away only New Jersey. The cashier takes crypto, but the site publishes fewer specifics than any operator we list.
- KYC
- Required
Restricted countries: New Jersey (US).
Alex Rivera
Alex covers crypto markets and trading, testing every platform hands-on before writing about it.
